anybody but bush …or ralph
Saturday, April 3rd, 2004 | otherStuff
(written back before hope, when elections werent won, they were robbed)
*anybody but bush, (or ralph)*
its not that i don’t agree w/ralph nader’s views:
-that washington D.C. is corporate ruled & dominated
-that the bush regime has been the most anti-progressive presidency in our lifetime
-that this country needs more choices than republicans & democrats,
(the lesser of 2 evils is, after all, still evil)
…i even agree w/ ralph’s opinion that his candicacy will galvanize democrats to get out the vote to defeat bush
…i’m all for 3rd parties & independents, & i have a hard time living w/the concept that the best way for the progressives in this country to get their agendas across is by turning into democrats; it strikes me as pretty un-progressive
…kucinich, a very forward-thinking, left-leaning, liberal, PROGRESSIVE democrat, who’s stance on most issues practically mirror ralph’s, has all but been left in the dust
…if the democrats wanted a progressive vision, they’ve had their chance w/citizen dennis
…instead they opted for the “electability” of kerry
…the people have spoken, ralph; they aren’t ready for your green vision
…altho i defend his right to run, i kinda wish he wouldnt
No comments yet.
